Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Journal of Horticulture and Agricultural Sciences (JHAS)
Articles

Effect of Different Packaging Materials on Physico-Chemical Characteristics of Guava

Talib Hussain Rind
Department of Horticulture, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam, Pakistan
Maria Abro
Department of Horticulture, Sindh Agriculture University, Tandojam
Kaleem Kakar
Agriculture Extension, Killa Abdullah
Muhzzam Anwar
Department of Horticulture, Balouchistan Agriculture College Quetta
Mohammad Asif
Department of Horticulture, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam, Pakistan
Amir Ali
Institute of Horticultural Sciences, University of Agriculture Faisalabad
Muhammad Nawaz Baloch
Department of Horticulture, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam, Pakistan
Gulam Hussain Bugti
Department of Agronomy, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam
Farhan Ali
Department of Horticulture, Sindh Agriculture University Tandojam, Pakistan

Published 2026-05-24

Keywords

  • Guava,
  • packaging materials,
  • wooden crates,
  • physico-chemical properties,
  • storage

How to Cite

Hussain Raind, T., Abro, M., Kakar, K., Anwar, M., Asif, M., Ali, A., … Ali Jatoi, F. (2026). Effect of Different Packaging Materials on Physico-Chemical Characteristics of Guava. Journal of Horticulture and Agricultural Sciences , 3(1), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.63459/jhas.2026.1.31

Abstract

Postharvest losses in guava are largely influenced by improper packaging, which affects fruit quality under ambient conditions. Therefore, the present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of different packaging materials on physico-chemical characteristics of guava (Psidium guajava L.) at the Department of Horticulture, Sindh Agriculture University, Tandojam, during 2015. The experiment was laid out in a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with two varieties, Shimla Gola and Allahabad, and four packaging materials viz. wooden crates, paper bags, plastic bags and gunny bags, each replicated three times. The fruits were stored at room temperature (24 ± 2°C), and observations were recorded on fruit weight, pH, moisture content, total soluble solids (TSS), ash content, and fruit diameter. The results revealed that the Allahabad variety significantly performed better in most parameters, showing higher fruit weight (115.16 g), moisture content (27.75%), TSS (6.33 °Brix), ash content (0.46%), and fruit diameter (2.30 cm) under wooden crates, while the highest pH (5.54) was recorded under gunny bags, compared to Shimla Gola. In Shimla Gola, comparatively lower values were recorded; the maximum fruit weight (92.26 g), pH (5.44), fruit diameter (2.13 cm), and TSS (4.49 °Brix) were observed under paper bags, while moisture content (26.64%) was recorded under both paper and gunny bags, and ash content (0.36%) was highest under wooden crates. Among packaging materials, wooden crates showed superior performance in Allahabad for most quality attributes, while paper bags performed relatively better in Shimla Gola for fruit weight, TSS, and fruit diameter. In contrast, gunny bags generally recorded the lowest values for most parameters in both varieties. It is concluded that packaging materials significantly influence postharvest quality of guava, and the Allahabad variety packed in wooden crates maintained better physico-chemical quality under ambient storage conditions.

References

  1. Ali, M., Wagan, H., Ali, A., Hussain, T., &Bibi, H. (2025). Agribusiness Value Chain Analysis of Guava from Producer Perspectives in Taluka and District Larkana Sindh Pakistan. The Asian Bulletin of Big Data Management, 5(3), 63-86.
  2. Anusha, M., Sri, K. R., Lokesh, M., Deepthi, N. M., &Malleswari, M. D. (2024). Postharvest management techniques for improved shelf life of horticultural crops: A review. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International, 46(11), 362-380.
  3. Al-Dairi, M., Pathare, P. B., & Al-Yahyai, R. (2021). Chemical and nutritional quality changes of tomato during postharvest transportation and storage. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 20(6), 401-408.
  4. Bhatla, S. C., &Kathpalia, R. (2023). Essential and functional mineral elements. In Plant physiology, development and metabolism (pp. 25-49). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
  5. Chen, N., Wei, W., Yang, Y., Chen, L., Shan, W., Chen, J., ...& Wu, C. (2024). Postharvest physiology and handling of guava fruit. Foods, 13(5), 805.
  6. Deepthi, V. P. (2017). Physiological and biochemical changes during fruit growth, maturity and ripening of guava: A review. J. PostHarvestTechnol, 5, 1-6.
  7. Fadiji, T., Rashvand, M., Daramola, M. O., &Iwarere, S. A. (2023). A review on antimicrobial packaging for extending the shelf life of food. Processes, 11(2), 590.
  8. Gangappa, N. D., Singh, C., Verma, M. K., Thakre, M., Sevanthi, A. M., Singh, R., ...&Nagaraja, A. (2022). Assessing the genetic diversity of guava germplasm characterized by morpho-biochemical traits. Frontiers in nutrition, 9, 1017680.
  9. Giannakourou, M. C., &Tsironi, T. N. (2021). Application of processing and packaging hurdles for fresh-cut fruits and vegetables preservation. Foods, 10(4), 830.
  10. Gill, K. B. S. (2016). Techniques for extending shelf life of guava fruits: a review. In International Symposia on Tropical and Temperate Horticulture-ISTTH2016 1205 (pp. 959-969).
  11. Gull, S., Ejaz, S., Ali, S., Ali, M. M., Sardar, H., Azam, M., ...&Almutairi, M. H. (2024). Xanthan gum-based edible coating effectively preserve postharvest quality of ‘Gola’guava fruits by regulating physiological and biochemical processes. BMC Plant Biology, 24(1), 450.
  12. Hanani, Z. N., Sonawane, A. D., & Mahajan, P. V. (2023). Impact of humidity, temperature and condensation on O2 and CO2 transmission rate of modified atmosphere packages. Food Packaging and Shelf Life, 39, 101132.
  13. Kamboj, K., Kaur, G., Kaur Kang, K., Kumar Arora, N., & Singh Brar, J. (2025). Comparative Study on Morphological and Physiological Changes During Fruit Development in Three Guava (Psidiumguajava L.) Cultivars. Applied Fruit Science, 67(5), 315.
  14. Kapoor, S., Gandhi, N., & Kapoor, A. (2020). Guava (Psidiumguajava). In Antioxidants in Fruits: Properties and Health Benefits (pp. 227-249). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
  15. Kaur, K., Dhillon, W. S., & Mahajan, B. V. C. (2013). Effect of different packaging materials and storage intervals on physical and biochemical characteristics of pear. Journal of food science and technology, 50(1), 147-152.
  16. Khan, D., Ullah, A., Bibi, Z., Ullah, I., Zulfiqar, M., & Khan, Z. U. (2020). Forecasting area and production of guava in Pakistan: An econometric analysis. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 36(1), 272-281.
  17. Kumar, M., Kapoor, S., Dhumal, S., Tkaczewska, J., Changan, S., Saurabh, V., ...&Bhuyan, D. J. (2022). Guava (Psidiumguajava L.) seed: A low-volume, high-value byproduct for human health and the food industry. Food Chemistry, 386, 132694.
  18. Landaverde, A. C., Shreckhise, J. H., &Altland, J. E. (2020). Storage procedures affect pH, electrical conductivity, and nutrient concentrations of pour-through leachate from pine bark and peat-based substrates. HortScience, 55(10), 1597-1604.
  19. Lin, M., Fawole, O. A., Saeys, W., Wu, D., Wang, J., Opara, U. L., ...& Chen, K. (2023). Mechanical damages and packaging methods along the fresh fruit supply chain: A review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 63(30), 10283-10302.
  20. Liu, F., Hai, M., Mei, B., Yi, L., &Xie, S. (2025). How does mechanical damage affect the preservability of postharvest fruits and vegetables?. LWT, 118781.
  21. Lufu, R., Ambaw, A., &Opara, U. L. (2024). Assessing weight loss control strategies in pomegranate (Punicagranatum L.) fruit: plastic packaging and surface waxing. Sustainable Food Technology, 2(1), 175-188.
  22. Mangaraj, S., Goswami, T. K., Giri, S. K., &Joshy, C. G. (2014). Design and development of modified atmosphere packaging system for guava (cv. Baruipur). Journal of Food Science and Technology, 51(11), 2925-2946.
  23. Meti, S. C., Vyshnavi, A., Patil, P., Khayum, A., Siddiqua, A., Shekar, R. R., & Kaur, R. (2024). ADVANCEMENTS IN FRUIT PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY: A REVIEW. Plant Archives (09725210), 24(2).
  24. Molla, S. W., Delele, M. A., Mekonen, T. N., &Tsige, A. A. (2023). Model-based design and development of horticultural produce crate from bamboo. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 9(1), 2202051.
  25. Mosie, T., &Woldetsadik, P. (2018). Effect of Plastic Packaging and Storage Environment on Shelf Life and Quality of Some Peach (Prunuspersica L.) Genotypes at Holeta, Central Ethiopia (Doctoral dissertation, Haramayauniversity).
  26. Munir, A., Khan, S. M., Jamal, A., Mihoub, A., Saeed, M. F., Ahmad, S., ...&Alharbi, K. (2022). Effect of different packaging storage techniques on physiological and chemical changes in Citrus sinensis L. Adv. Food Sci, 44(2), 45-53.
  27. Nagaraja, S. K., Kumar, P., R, K., Nabi, S. U., Mir, J. I., Verma, M. K., ... &Mansoor, S. (2026). A Comprehensive Review of Biochemical Insights and Advanced Packaging Technologies for Shelf-Life Enhancement of Temperate Fruits. Biosensors, 16(2), 94.
  28. Nagaraja, A., Nayan, D. G., Thakre, M., Vasugi, C., Selvakumar, R., & Singh, S. K. (2025). Genetic Diversity of Guava (Psidiumguajava L.) and Sustainable Utilization. In Genetic Diversity of Fruits and Nuts (pp. 128-145). CRC Press.
  29. Naseer, S., Hussain, S., Naeem, N., Pervaiz, M., & Rahman, M. (2018). The phytochemistry and medicinal value of Psidiumguajava (guava). Clinical phytoscience, 4(1), 32.
  30. Omayio, G. D. (2021). Production, Utilization and Processing of Kenyan Guavas: Development Of Nutrient-Enriched Guava Nectars From Local Varieties (Doctoral dissertation, UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI).
  31. Panigrahi, C., Shaikh, A. E. Y., Bag, B. B., Mishra, H. N., & De, S. (2021). A technological review on processing of sugarcane juice: Spoilage, preservation, storage, and packaging aspects. Journal of Food Process Engineering, 44(6), e13706.
  32. Pisciotta, A., Planeta, D., Giacosa, S., Paissoni, M. A., Di Lorenzo, R., & Rolle, L. (2020). Quality of grapes grown inside paper bags in Mediterranean area. Agronomy, 10(6), 792.
  33. Qu, P., Zhang, M., Fan, K., &Guo, Z. (2022). Microporous modified atmosphere packaging to extend shelf life of fresh foods: A review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 62(1), 51-65.
  34. Rajapaksha, L., Gunathilake, D. M. C. C., Pathirana, S. M., & Fernando, T. (2021). Reducing post-harvest losses in fruits and vegetables for ensuring food security—Case of Sri Lanka. MOJ Food Process Technols, 9(1), 7-16.
  35. Rehman, M. A. U., & Khan, I. (2022). Medicinal and pharmacological potential of Guava leaf powder, A Review. International Journal of Natural Medicine and Health Sciences, 1(2).
  36. Roy, T., Kalambukattu, J. G., Biswas, S. S., & Kumar, S. (2023). Agro-climatic variability in climate change scenario: adaptive approach and sustainability. In Ecological footprints of climate change: Adaptive approaches and sustainability (pp. 313-348). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  37. Shah, M. H., Rafique, R., Almas, M., Usman, M., Yasin, S., &Bibi, S. (2022). A Review: Fruit Production Industry of Pakistan Trends, Issues and Way Forward. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research, 35(3).
  38. Shi, Y., Zhang, W., & Zhou, G. (2020). Effects of different moisture-permeable packaging on the quality of aging beef compared with wet aging and dry aging. Foods, 9(5), 649.
  39. Siedt, M., Teggers, E. M., Linnemann, V., Schäffer, A., & van Dongen, J. T. (2023). Microbial degradation of plant residues rapidly causes long-lasting hypoxia in soil upon irrigation and affects leaching of nitrogen and metals. Soil Systems, 7(2), 62.
  40. Subedi, T. (2023). An assessment of mineral contents in fruits. Prithvi Academic Journal, 21-31.
  41. Tadesse, K. T. (2024). The role of post-harvest management in ensuring food security in a changing world. Journal of Clinical Research and Case Studies, 2(3), 1-14.
  42. Twede, D., Selke, S. E., Kamdem, D. P., & Shires, D. (2014). Cartons, crates and corrugated board: handbook of paper and wood packaging technology. DEStech Publications, Inc.
  43. Teixeira, G. H., Júnior, L. C. C., Ferraudo, A. S., &Durigan, J. F. (2016). Quality of guava (Psidiumguajava L. cv. Pedro Sato) fruit stored in low-O2 controlled atmospheres is negatively affected by increasing levels of CO2. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 111, 62-68.
  44. Tucker, G., Yin, X., Zhang, A., Wang, M., Zhu, Q., Liu, X., ...& Grierson, D. (2017). Ethylene and fruit softening. Food Quality and Safety, 1(4), 253-267.
  45. Vijayalakshmi, N. (2017). Influence Of Packaging Materials And Desiccant On Storability Of Kernel And Pod Of Summer Groundnut (ArachisHypogaea L.).
  46. Vikram, B., Gautam, D. K., Tondihal, M. S., Chaturvedi, S., Verma, S., Yadav, H. C., ...&Nayak, T. (2024). Revolutionizing guava food processing: a fresh perspective. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 14(2), 14-22.
  47. Vu, N. D., Nguyen, V. M., & Tran, T. T. (2023). Effects of pH, total soluble solids, and pectin concentration on color, texture, vitamin C, and sensory quality of mango fruit bar. International Journal of Food Science, 2023(1), 6618300.
  48. Yousaf, A. A., Abbasi, K. S., &Faiz, M. (2024). Post-harvest quality assessment of guava fruit (Psidiumguajava. L.) CV.'Gola'in response to different packaging materials. International Journal of Postharvest Technology and Innovation, 9(2), 93-109.
  49. Yousaf, A. A., Abbasi, K. S., Ibrahim, M. S., Sohail, A., Faiz, M., &Khadim, M. (2024). Storage stability assessment of guava fruit (Psidiumguajava L.) cv.‘Gola’in response to different packaging materials. Sustainable Food Technology, 2(1), 210-221.
  50. Yadav, A., Kumar, N., Upadhyay, A., Fawole, O. A., Mahawar, M. K., Jalgaonkar, K., ...&Mekhemar, M. (2022). Recent advances in novel packaging technologies for shelf-life extension of guava fruits for retaining health benefits for longer duration. Plants, 11(4), 547.